# Rethinking the Defense Against Free-rider Attack From the Perspective of Model Weight Evolving Frequency

Source: [Rethinking the Defense Against Free-rider Attack From the Perspective of Model Weight Evolving Frequency](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cc21e209131cea35da3>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-27T06:15:31.717Z

Authors: Jinyin Chen, Mingjun Li, Tao Liu, Haibin Zheng, Yao Cheng, Changting Lin

Published: 2022-06-11T03:11:13.000Z

## Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning approach where multiple clients collaboratively train a joint model without exchanging their data. Despite FL's unprecedented success in data privacy-preserving, its vulnerability to free-rider attacks has attracted increasing attention. Existing defenses may be ineffective against highly camouflaged or high percentages of free riders. To address these challenges, we reconsider the defense from a novel perspective, i.e., model weight evolving frequency.Empirically, we gain a novel insight that during the FL's training, the model weight evolving frequency of free-riders and that of benign clients are significantly different. Inspired by this insight, we propose a novel defense method based on the model Weight Evolving Frequency, referred to as WEF-Defense.Specifically, we first collect the weight evolving frequency (defined as WEF-Matrix) during local training. For each client, it uploads the local model's WEF-Matrix to the server together with its model weight for each iteration. The server then separates free-riders from benign clients based on the difference in the WEF-Matrix. Finally, the server uses a personalized approach to provide different global models for corresponding clients. Comprehensive experiments conducted on five datasets and five models demonstrate that WEF-Defense achieves better defense effectiveness than the state-of-the-art baselines.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Free-rider Detection on MNIST IID Scenario 1](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/free-rider-detection-on-mnist-iid-scenario-1.md>): Free-rider Detection; MNIST IID Scenario 1; F1 Score: 99.

- [Free-rider Detection on CIFAR-10 Non-IID Scenario 1](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/free-rider-detection-on-cifar-10-non-iid-scenario-1.md>): Free-rider Detection; CIFAR-10 Non-IID Scenario 1; F1 Score: 16.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.05406>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.05406.pdf>)
