# Declaration-based Prompt Tuning for Visual Question Answering

Source: [Declaration-based Prompt Tuning for Visual Question Answering](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c751e209131cea34062>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T00:10:48.263Z

Authors: Yuhang Liu, Wei Wei, Daowan Peng, Feida Zhu

Published: 2022-05-05T05:56:55.000Z

## Abstract

In recent years, the pre-training-then-fine-tuning paradigm has yielded immense success on a wide spectrum of cross-modal tasks, such as visual question answering (VQA), in which a visual-language (VL) model is first optimized via self-supervised task objectives, e.g., masked language modeling (MLM) and image-text matching (ITM), and then fine-tuned to adapt to downstream task (e.g., VQA) via a brand-new objective function, e.g., answer prediction. The inconsistency of the objective forms not only severely limits the generalization of pre-trained VL models to downstream tasks, but also requires a large amount of labeled data for fine-tuning. To alleviate the problem, we propose an innovative VL fine-tuning paradigm (named Declaration-based Prompt Tuning, abbreviated as DPT), which jointly optimizes the objectives of pre-training and fine-tuning of VQA model, boosting the effective adaptation of pre-trained VL models to the downstream task. Specifically, DPT reformulates the objective form of VQA task via (1) textual adaptation, which converts the given questions into declarative sentence-form for prompt-tuning, and (2) task adaptation, which optimizes the objective function of VQA problem in the manner of pre-training phase. Experimental results on GQA dataset show that DPT outperforms the fine-tuned counterpart by a large margin regarding accuracy in both fully-supervised (2.68%) and zero-shot/few-shot (over 31%) settings. All the data and codes will be available to facilitate future research.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.02456>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.02456.pdf>)
