# HFT: Lifting Perspective Representations via Hybrid Feature Transformation

Source: [HFT: Lifting Perspective Representations via Hybrid Feature Transformation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c451e209131cea33217>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-26T00:07:48.255Z

Authors: Jiayu Zou, Junrui Xiao, Zheng Zhu, Junjie Huang, Guan Huang, Dalong Du, Xingang Wang

Published: 2022-04-11T13:09:54.000Z

## Abstract

Autonomous driving requires accurate and detailed Bird's Eye View (BEV) semantic segmentation for decision making, which is one of the most challenging tasks for high-level scene perception. Feature transformation from frontal view to BEV is the pivotal technology for BEV semantic segmentation. Existing works can be roughly classified into two categories, i.e., Camera model-Based Feature Transformation (CBFT) and Camera model-Free Feature Transformation (CFFT). In this paper, we empirically analyze the vital differences between CBFT and CFFT. The former transforms features based on the flat-world assumption, which may cause distortion of regions lying above the ground plane. The latter is limited in the segmentation performance due to the absence of geometric priors and time-consuming computation. In order to reap the benefits and avoid the drawbacks of CBFT and CFFT, we propose a novel framework with a Hybrid Feature Transformation module (HFT). Specifically, we decouple the feature maps produced by HFT for estimating the layout of outdoor scenes in BEV. Furthermore, we design a mutual learning scheme to augment hybrid transformation by applying feature mimicking. Notably, extensive experiments demonstrate that with negligible extra overhead, HFT achieves a relative improvement of 13.3% on the Argoverse dataset and 16.8% on the KITTI 3D Object datasets compared to the best-performing existing method. The codes are available at https://github.com/JiayuZou2020/HFT.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.05068>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.05068.pdf>)
