# MCDAL: Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Active Learning

Source: [MCDAL: Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Active Learning](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bd81e209131cea308d6>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T23:58:04.948Z

Authors: Jae Won Cho, Dong-Jin Kim, Yunjae Jung, In So Kweon

Published: 2021-07-23T06:57:08.000Z

## Abstract

Recent state-of-the-art active learning methods have mostly leveraged Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) for sample acquisition; however, GAN is usually known to suffer from instability and sensitivity to hyper-parameters. In contrast to these methods, we propose in this paper a novel active learning framework that we call Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Active Learning (MCDAL) which takes the prediction discrepancies between multiple classifiers. In particular, we utilize two auxiliary classification layers that learn tighter decision boundaries by maximizing the discrepancies among them. Intuitively, the discrepancies in the auxiliary classification layers' predictions indicate the uncertainty in the prediction. In this regard, we propose a novel method to leverage the classifier discrepancies for the acquisition function for active learning. We also provide an interpretation of our idea in relation to existing GAN based active learning methods and domain adaptation frameworks. Moreover, we empirically demonstrate the utility of our approach where the performance of our approach exceeds the state-of-the-art methods on several image classification and semantic segmentation datasets in active learning setups.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test.md>): Image Classification; CIFAR-10 (test); Accuracy: 87.2.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11049>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.11049.pdf>)
