# Improved Pillar with Fine-grained Feature for 3D Object Detection

Source: [Improved Pillar with Fine-grained Feature for 3D Object Detection](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6af61e209131cea2b664>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T23:37:16.577Z

Authors: Jiahui Fu, Guanghui Ren, Yunpeng Chen, Si Liu

Published: 2021-10-12T14:53:14.000Z

## Abstract

3D object detection with LiDAR point clouds plays an important role in autonomous driving perception module that requires high speed, stability and accuracy. However, the existing point-based methods are challenging to reach the speed requirements because of too many raw points, and the voxel-based methods are unable to ensure stable speed because of the 3D sparse convolution. In contrast, the 2D grid-based methods, such as PointPillar, can easily achieve a stable and efficient speed based on simple 2D convolution, but it is hard to get the competitive accuracy limited by the coarse-grained point clouds representation. So we propose an improved pillar with fine-grained feature based on PointPillar that can significantly improve detection accuracy. It consists of two modules, including height-aware sub-pillar and sparsity-based tiny-pillar, which get fine-grained representation respectively in the vertical and horizontal direction of 3D space. For height-aware sub-pillar, we introduce a height position encoding to keep height information of each sub-pillar during projecting to a 2D pseudo image. For sparsity-based tiny-pillar, we introduce sparsity-based CNN backbone stacked by dense feature and sparse attention module to extract feature with larger receptive field efficiently. Experimental results show that our proposed method significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art 3D detection methods on the Waymo Open Dataset. The related code will be released to facilitate the academic and industrial study.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06049>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.06049.pdf>)
