# IMENet: Joint 3D Semantic Scene Completion and 2D Semantic Segmentation through Iterative Mutual Enhancement

Source: [IMENet: Joint 3D Semantic Scene Completion and 2D Semantic Segmentation through Iterative Mutual Enhancement](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a451e209131cea2732c>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T23:21:36.715Z

Authors: Jie Li, Laiyan Ding, Rui Huang

Published: 2021-06-29T13:34:20.000Z

## Abstract

3D semantic scene completion and 2D semantic segmentation are two tightly correlated tasks that are both essential for indoor scene understanding, because they predict the same semantic classes, using positively correlated high-level features. Current methods use 2D features extracted from early-fused RGB-D images for 2D segmentation to improve 3D scene completion. We argue that this sequential scheme does not ensure these two tasks fully benefit each other, and present an Iterative Mutual Enhancement Network (IMENet) to solve them jointly, which interactively refines the two tasks at the late prediction stage. Specifically, two refinement modules are developed under a unified framework for the two tasks. The first is a 2D Deformable Context Pyramid (DCP) module, which receives the projection from the current 3D predictions to refine the 2D predictions. In turn, a 3D Deformable Depth Attention (DDA) module is proposed to leverage the reprojected results from 2D predictions to update the coarse 3D predictions. This iterative fusion happens to the stable high-level features of both tasks at a late stage. Extensive experiments on NYU and NYUCAD datasets verify the effectiveness of the proposed iterative late fusion scheme, and our approach outperforms the state of the art on both 3D semantic scene completion and 2D semantic segmentation.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Scene Completion on NYU dataset (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/scene-completion-on-nyu-dataset-test.md>): Scene Completion; NYU dataset (test); mIoU: 72.1.

- [Semantic Scene Completion on NYUCAD](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-scene-completion-on-nyucad.md>): Semantic Scene Completion; NYUCAD; mIoU: 47.5.

- [Scene Completion on NYUCAD](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/scene-completion-on-nyucad.md>): Scene Completion; NYUCAD; mIoU: 79.1.

- [Semantic Scene Completion on NYU (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/semantic-scene-completion-on-nyu-test.md>): Semantic Scene Completion; NYU (test); Ceiling Error: 43.6.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15413>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.15413.pdf>)
