# Active Deep Densely Connected Convolutional Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification Source: [Active Deep Densely Connected Convolutional Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2025-10-28T13:56:48.645Z Authors: Bing Liu, Anzhu Yu, Pengqiang Zhang, Lei Ding, Wenyue Guo, Kuiliang Gao, Xibing Zuo Published: 2020-09-01T09:53:38.000Z ## Abstract Deep learning based methods have seen a massive rise in popularity for hyperspectral image classification over the past few years. However, the success of deep learning is attributed greatly to numerous labeled samples. It is still very challenging to use only a few labeled samples to train deep learning models to reach a high classification accuracy. An active deep-learning framework trained by an end-to-end manner is, therefore, proposed by this paper in order to minimize the hyperspectral image classification costs. First, a deep densely connected convolutional network is considered for hyperspectral image classification. Different from the traditional active learning methods, an additional network is added to the designed deep densely connected convolutional network to predict the loss of input samples. Then, the additional network could be used to suggest unlabeled samples that the deep densely connected convolutional network is more likely to produce a wrong label. Note that the additional network uses the intermediate features of the deep densely connected convolutional network as input. Therefore, the proposed method is an end-to-end framework. Subsequently, a few of the selected samples are labelled manually and added to the training samples. The deep densely connected convolutional network is therefore trained using the new training set. Finally, the steps above are repeated to train the whole framework iteratively. Extensive experiments illustrates that the method proposed could reach a high accuracy in classification after selecting just a few samples. ## Recorded benchmark results A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. ## Original sources and implementation [Original paper]() [PDF]()