# Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios

Source: [Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarios](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a371e209131cea26a4f>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T23:18:37.363Z

Authors: Christian Tomani, Sebastian Gruber, Muhammed Ebrar Erdem, Daniel Cremers, Florian Buettner

Published: 2020-12-20T18:21:13.000Z

## Abstract

We address the problem of uncertainty calibration. While standard deep neural networks typically yield uncalibrated predictions, calibrated confidence scores that are representative of the true likelihood of a prediction can be achieved using post-hoc calibration methods. However, to date the focus of these approaches has been on in-domain calibration. Our contribution is two-fold. First, we show that existing post-hoc calibration methods yield highly over-confident predictions under domain shift. Second, we introduce a simple strategy where perturbations are applied to samples in the validation set before performing the post-hoc calibration step. In extensive experiments, we demonstrate that this perturbation step results in substantially better calibration under domain shift on a wide range of architectures and modelling tasks.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Class-Incremental Learning on TinyImageNet (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/class-incremental-learning-on-tinyimagenet-test.md>): Class-incremental learning; TinyImageNet (test); Accuracy: 31.48.

- [Class-Incremental Learning on CIFAR-100 (test) with Accuracy and Calibration Metrics](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/class-incremental-learning-on-cifar-100-test-with-accuracy-and-calibration-metrics.md>): Class-incremental learning; CIFAR-100 (test); Accuracy: 56.25.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.10988>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.10988.pdf>)
