# Sparse LiDAR and Stereo Fusion (SLS-Fusion) for Depth Estimationand 3D Object Detection

Source: [Sparse LiDAR and Stereo Fusion (SLS-Fusion) for Depth Estimationand 3D Object Detection](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a031e209131cea256b7>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T23:13:37.567Z

Authors: Nguyen Anh Minh Mai, Pierre Duthon, Louahdi Khoudour, Alain Crouzil, Sergio A. Velastin

Published: 2021-03-05T23:10:09.000Z

## Abstract

The ability to accurately detect and localize objects is recognized as being the most important for the perception of self-driving cars. From 2D to 3D object detection, the most difficult is to determine the distance from the ego-vehicle to objects. Expensive technology like LiDAR can provide a precise and accurate depth information, so most studies have tended to focus on this sensor showing a performance gap between LiDAR-based methods and camera-based methods. Although many authors have investigated how to fuse LiDAR with RGB cameras, as far as we know there are no studies to fuse LiDAR and stereo in a deep neural network for the 3D object detection task. This paper presents SLS-Fusion, a new approach to fuse data from 4-beam LiDAR and a stereo camera via a neural network for depth estimation to achieve better dense depth maps and thereby improves 3D object detection performance. Since 4-beam LiDAR is cheaper than the well-known 64-beam LiDAR, this approach is also classified as a low-cost sensors-based method. Through evaluation on the KITTI benchmark, it is shown that the proposed method significantly improves depth estimation performance compared to a baseline method. Also, when applying it to 3D object detection, a new state of the art on low-cost sensor based method is achieved.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03977>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.03977.pdf>)
