# Improving Medical Image Classification with Label Noise Using Dual-uncertainty Estimation

Source: [Improving Medical Image Classification with Label Noise Using Dual-uncertainty Estimation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698e1e209131cea2290f>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T23:02:46.333Z

Authors: Lie Ju, Xin Wang, Lin Wang, Dwarikanath Mahapatra, Xin Zhao, Mehrtash Harandi, Tom Drummond, Tongliang Liu, Zongyuan Ge

Published: 2021-02-28T14:56:45.000Z

## Abstract

Deep neural networks are known to be data-driven and label noise can have a marked impact on model performance. Recent studies have shown great robustness to classic image recognition even under a high noisy rate. In medical applications, learning from datasets with label noise is more challenging since medical imaging datasets tend to have asymmetric (class-dependent) noise and suffer from high observer variability.   In this paper, we systematically discuss and define the two common types of label noise in medical images - disagreement label noise from inconsistency expert opinions and single-target label noise from wrong diagnosis record. We then propose an uncertainty estimation-based framework to handle these two label noise amid the medical image classification task. We design a dual-uncertainty estimation approach to measure the disagreement label noise and single-target label noise via Direct Uncertainty Prediction and Monte-Carlo-Dropout.   A boosting-based curriculum training procedure is later introduced for robust learning. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by conducting extensive experiments on three different diseases: skin lesions, prostate cancer, and retinal diseases. We also release a large re-engineered database that consists of annotations from more than ten ophthalmologists with an unbiased golden standard dataset for evaluation and benchmarking.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00528>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.00528.pdf>)
