# A Multi-resolution Model for Histopathology Image Classification and Localization with Multiple Instance Learning

Source: [A Multi-resolution Model for Histopathology Image Classification and Localization with Multiple Instance Learning](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68a71e209131cea1d713>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-27T06:04:44.961Z

Authors: Jiayun Li, Wenyuan Li, Anthony Sisk, Huihui Ye, W. Dean Wallace, William Speier, Corey W. Arnold

Published: 2020-11-05T06:42:39.000Z

## Abstract

Histopathological images provide rich information for disease diagnosis. Large numbers of histopathological images have been digitized into high resolution whole slide images, opening opportunities in developing computational image analysis tools to reduce pathologists' workload and potentially improve inter- and intra- observer agreement. Most previous work on whole slide image analysis has focused on classification or segmentation of small pre-selected regions-of-interest, which requires fine-grained annotation and is non-trivial to extend for large-scale whole slide analysis. In this paper, we proposed a multi-resolution multiple instance learning model that leverages saliency maps to detect suspicious regions for fine-grained grade prediction. Instead of relying on expensive region- or pixel-level annotations, our model can be trained end-to-end with only slide-level labels. The model is developed on a large-scale prostate biopsy dataset containing 20,229 slides from 830 patients. The model achieved 92.7% accuracy, 81.8% Cohen's Kappa for benign, low grade (i.e. Grade group 1) and high grade (i.e. Grade group \>= 2) prediction, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 98.2% and an average precision (AP) of 97.4% for differentiating malignant and benign slides. The model obtained an AUROC of 99.4% and an AP of 99.8% for cancer detection on an external dataset.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Whole Slide Image classification on CAMELYON16 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/whole-slide-image-classification-on-camelyon16-test.md>): Whole Slide Image classification; CAMELYON16 (test); AUC: not recorded.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.02679>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.02679.pdf>)
