# Class-Agnostic Segmentation Loss and Its Application to Salient Object Detection and Segmentation

Source: [Class-Agnostic Segmentation Loss and Its Application to Salient Object Detection and Segmentation](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa689e1e209131cea1d1b7>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T22:40:59.400Z

Authors: Angira Sharma, Naeemullah Khan, Ganesh Sundaramoorthi, Philip Torr

Published: 2020-10-28T07:11:15.000Z

## Abstract

In this paper we present a novel loss function, called class-agnostic segmentation (CAS) loss. With CAS loss the class descriptors are learned during training of the network. We don't require to define the label of a class a-priori, rather the CAS loss clusters regions with similar appearance together in a weakly-supervised manner. Furthermore, we show that the CAS loss function is sparse, bounded, and robust to class-imbalance. We apply our CAS loss function with fully-convolutional ResNet101 and DeepLab-v3 architectures to the binary segmentation problem of salient object detection. We investigate the performance against the state-of-the-art methods in two settings of low and high-fidelity training data on seven salient object detection datasets. For low-fidelity training data (incorrect class label) class-agnostic segmentation loss outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on salient object detection datasets by staggering margins of around 50%. For high-fidelity training data (correct class labels) class-agnostic segmentation models perform as good as the state-of-the-art approaches while beating the state-of-the-art methods on most datasets. In order to show the utility of the loss function across different domains we also test on general segmentation dataset, where class-agnostic segmentation loss outperforms cross-entropy based loss by huge margins on both region and edge metrics.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14793>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.14793.pdf>)
