# A Comparison of Deep Learning Object Detection Models for Satellite Imagery

Source: [A Comparison of Deep Learning Object Detection Models for Satellite Imagery](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68531e209131cea1b83a>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T22:35:00.393Z

Authors: Austen Groener, Gary Chern, Mark Pritt

Published: 2020-09-10T13:43:14.000Z

## Abstract

In this work, we compare the detection accuracy and speed of several state-of-the-art models for the task of detecting oil and gas fracking wells and small cars in commercial electro-optical satellite imagery. Several models are studied from the single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage object detection families of techniques. For the detection of fracking well pads (50m - 250m), we find single-stage detectors provide superior prediction speed while also matching detection performance of their two and multi-stage counterparts. However, for detecting small cars, two-stage and multi-stage models provide substantially higher accuracies at the cost of some speed. We also measure timing results of the sliding window object detection algorithm to provide a baseline for comparison. Some of these models have been incorporated into the Lockheed Martin Globally-Scalable Automated Target Recognition (GATR) framework.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04857>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.04857.pdf>)
