# Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Study

Source: [Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Study](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66fc1e209131cea1371c>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T22:03:19.943Z

Authors: Ahmed Alqaraawi, Martin Schuessler, Philipp Wei{\\ss}, Enrico Costanza, Nadia Berthouze

Published: 2020-02-03T14:17:11.000Z

## Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) offer great machine learning performance over a range of applications, but their operation is hard to interpret, even for experts. Various explanation algorithms have been proposed to address this issue, yet limited research effort has been reported concerning their user evaluation. In this paper, we report on an online between-group user study designed to evaluate the performance of "saliency maps" - a popular explanation algorithm for image classification applications of CNNs. Our results indicate that saliency maps produced by the LRP algorithm helped participants to learn about some specific image features the system is sensitive to. However, the maps seem to provide very limited help for participants to anticipate the network's output for new images. Drawing on our findings, we highlight implications for design and further research on explainable AI. In particular, we argue the HCI and AI communities should look beyond instance-level explanations.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00772>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.00772.pdf>)