# Adversarial Examples for Edge Detection: They Exist, and They Transfer

Source: [Adversarial Examples for Edge Detection: They Exist, and They Transfer](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65d61e209131cea0c92a>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T21:36:37.771Z

Authors: Christian Cosgrove, Alan L. Yuille

Published: 2019-06-02T03:51:21.000Z

## Abstract

Convolutional neural networks have recently advanced the state of the art in many tasks including edge and object boundary detection. However, in this paper, we demonstrate that these edge detectors inherit a troubling property of neural networks: they can be fooled by adversarial examples. We show that adding small perturbations to an image causes HED, a CNN-based edge detection model, to fail to locate edges, to detect nonexistent edges, and even to hallucinate arbitrary configurations of edges. More surprisingly, we find that these adversarial examples transfer to other CNN-based vision models. In particular, attacks on edge detection result in significant drops in accuracy in models trained to perform unrelated, high-level tasks like image classification and semantic segmentation. Our code will be made public.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00335>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.00335.pdf>)
