# EAT-NAS: Elastic Architecture Transfer for Accelerating Large-scale Neural Architecture Search

Source: [EAT-NAS: Elastic Architecture Transfer for Accelerating Large-scale Neural Architecture Search](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65821e209131cea0aa6a>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T21:28:43.855Z

Authors: Jiemin Fang, Yukang Chen, Xinbang Zhang, Qian Zhang, Chang Huang, Gaofeng Meng, Wenyu Liu, Xinggang Wang

Published: 2019-01-17T16:48:12.000Z

## Abstract

Neural architecture search (NAS) methods have been proposed to release human experts from tedious architecture engineering. However, most current methods are constrained in small-scale search due to the issue of computational resources. Meanwhile, directly applying architectures searched on small datasets to large datasets often bears no performance guarantee. This limitation impedes the wide use of NAS on large-scale tasks. To overcome this obstacle, we propose an elastic architecture transfer mechanism for accelerating large-scale neural architecture search (EAT-NAS). In our implementations, architectures are first searched on a small dataset, e.g., CIFAR-10. The best one is chosen as the basic architecture. The search process on the large dataset, e.g., ImageNet, is initialized with the basic architecture as the seed. The large-scale search process is accelerated with the help of the basic architecture. What we propose is not only a NAS method but a mechanism for architecture-level transfer.   In our experiments, we obtain two final models EATNet-A and EATNet-B that achieve competitive accuracies, 74.7% and 74.2% on ImageNet, respectively, which also surpass the models searched from scratch on ImageNet under the same settings. For the computational cost, EAT-NAS takes only less than 5 days on 8 TITAN X GPUs, which is significantly less than the computational consumption of the state-of-the-art large-scale NAS methods.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.05884>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.05884.pdf>)
