# Light-Head R-CNN: In Defense of Two-Stage Object Detector

Source: [Light-Head R-CNN: In Defense of Two-Stage Object Detector](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63d01e209131cea00db0>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T20:50:10.530Z

Authors: Zeming Li, Chao Peng, Gang Yu, Xiangyu Zhang, Yangdong Deng, Jian Sun

Published: 2017-11-20T11:50:19.000Z

## Abstract

In this paper, we first investigate why typical two-stage methods are not as fast as single-stage, fast detectors like YOLO and SSD. We find that Faster R-CNN and R-FCN perform an intensive computation after or before RoI warping. Faster R-CNN involves two fully connected layers for RoI recognition, while R-FCN produces a large score maps. Thus, the speed of these networks is slow due to the heavy-head design in the architecture. Even if we significantly reduce the base model, the computation cost cannot be largely decreased accordingly.   We propose a new two-stage detector, Light-Head R-CNN, to address the shortcoming in current two-stage approaches. In our design, we make the head of network as light as possible, by using a thin feature map and a cheap R-CNN subnet (pooling and single fully-connected layer). Our ResNet-101 based light-head R-CNN outperforms state-of-art object detectors on COCO while keeping time efficiency. More importantly, simply replacing the backbone with a tiny network (e.g, Xception), our Light-Head R-CNN gets 30.7 mmAP at 102 FPS on COCO, significantly outperforming the single-stage, fast detectors like YOLO and SSD on both speed and accuracy. Code will be made publicly available.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Object Detection on PASCAL VOC 2012 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-detection-on-pascal-voc-2012-test.md>): Object Detection; PASCAL VOC 2012 (test); mAP: 80.8.

- [Object Detection on DOTA](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-detection-on-dota.md>): Object Detection; DOTA; mAP: 66.95.

- [Object Detection on COCO (test-dev)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-detection-on-coco-test-dev.md>): Object Detection; COCO (test-dev); mAP: 41.5.

- [Object Detection on MS COCO (test-dev)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/object-detection-on-ms-coco-test-dev.md>): Object Detection; MS COCO (test-dev); mAP@.5: not recorded.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.07264>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.07264.pdf>)
