# Evaluating Cell Type Inference in Vision Language Models Under Varying Visual Context

Source: [Evaluating Cell Type Inference in Vision Language Models Under Varying Visual Context](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5f811e209131ce9ea73b>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T19:19:45.987Z

Authors: Samarth Singhal, Sandeep Singhal

Published: 2025-06-15T01:50:16.000Z

## Abstract

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have rapidly advanced alongside Large Language Models (LLMs). This study evaluates the capabilities of prominent generative VLMs, such as GPT-4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, accessed via APIs, for histopathology image classification tasks, including cell typing. Using diverse datasets from public and private sources, we apply zero-shot and one-shot prompting methods to assess VLM performance, comparing them against custom-trained Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Our findings demonstrate that while one-shot prompting significantly improves VLM performance over zero-shot ($p \\approx 1.005 \\times 10^{-5}$ based on Kappa scores), these general-purpose VLMs currently underperform supervised CNNs on most tasks. This work underscores both the promise and limitations of applying current VLMs to specialized domains like pathology via in-context learning. All code and instructions for reproducing the study can be accessed from the repository https://www.github.com/a12dongithub/VLMCCE.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12683>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.12683.pdf>)
