# The Benefits of Being Distributional: Small-Loss Bounds for Reinforcement Learning

Source: [The Benefits of Being Distributional: Small-Loss Bounds for Reinforcement Learning](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5ae71e209131ce9c3dbf>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-01-04T04:32:52.157Z

Authors: Kaiwen Wang, Kevin Zhou, Runzhe Wu, Nathan Kallus, Wen Sun

Published: 2023-05-25T04:19:43.000Z

## Abstract

While distributional reinforcement learning (DistRL) has been empirically effective, the question of when and why it is better than vanilla, non-distributional RL has remained unanswered. This paper explains the benefits of DistRL through the lens of small-loss bounds, which are instance-dependent bounds that scale with optimal achievable cost. Particularly, our bounds converge much faster than those from non-distributional approaches if the optimal cost is small. As warmup, we propose a distributional contextual bandit (DistCB) algorithm, which we show enjoys small-loss regret bounds and empirically outperforms the state-of-the-art on three real-world tasks. In online RL, we propose a DistRL algorithm that constructs confidence sets using maximum likelihood estimation. We prove that our algorithm enjoys novel small-loss PAC bounds in low-rank MDPs. As part of our analysis, we introduce the $\\ell\_1$ distributional eluder dimension which may be of independent interest. Then, in offline RL, we show that pessimistic DistRL enjoys small-loss PAC bounds that are novel to the offline setting and are more robust to bad single-policy coverage.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

- [Contextual Bandit on King County Housing (All episodes)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/contextual-bandit-on-king-county-housing-all-episodes.md>): Contextual Bandit; King County Housing (All episodes); Average Cost: 0.726.

- [Contextual Bandit on King County Housing (Last 100 episodes)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/contextual-bandit-on-king-county-housing-last-100-episodes.md>): Contextual Bandit; King County Housing (Last 100 episodes); Average Cost: 0.708.

- [Contextual Bandit on Prudential Life Insurance (All episodes)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/contextual-bandit-on-prudential-life-insurance-all-episodes.md>): Contextual Bandit; Prudential Life Insurance (All episodes); Average Cost: 0.411.

- [Contextual Bandit on Prudential Life Insurance (Last 100 episodes)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/contextual-bandit-on-prudential-life-insurance-last-100-episodes.md>): Contextual Bandit; Prudential Life Insurance (Last 100 episodes); Average Cost: 0.388.

- [Contextual Bandit on CIFAR-100 (All episodes)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/contextual-bandit-on-cifar-100-all-episodes.md>): Contextual Bandit; CIFAR-100 (All episodes); Average Cost: 0.838.

- [Contextual Bandit on CIFAR-100 (Last 100 episodes)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/contextual-bandit-on-cifar-100-last-100-episodes.md>): Contextual Bandit; CIFAR-100 (Last 100 episodes); Average Cost: 0.775.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15703>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.15703.pdf>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/kevinzhou497/distcb>)
