# When do two networks have the same steady-state ideal?

Source: [When do two networks have the same steady-state ideal?](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa579c1e209131ce9a6ba2>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T14:49:32.215Z

Authors: Mark Curiel, Elizabeth Gross, Carlos Munoz

Published: 2020-12-03T20:38:37.000Z

## Abstract

Chemical reaction networks are often used to model and understand biological processes such as cell signaling. Under the framework of chemical reaction network theory, a process is modeled with a directed graph and a choice of kinetics, which together give rise to a dynamical system. Under the assumption of mass action kinetics, the dynamical system is polynomial. In this paper, we consider the ideals generated by the these polynomials, which are called steady-state ideals. Steady-state ideals appear in multiple contexts within the chemical reaction network literature, however they have yet to be systematically studied. To begin such a study, we ask and partially answer the following question: when do two reaction networks give rise to the same steady-state ideal? In particular, our main results describe three operations on the reaction graph that preserve the steady-state ideal. Furthermore, since the motivation for this work is the classification of steady-state ideals, monomials play a primary role. To this end, combinatorial conditions are given to identify monomials in a steady-state ideal, and we give a sufficient condition for a steady-state ideal to be monomial.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02251>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.02251.pdf>)
