# Drop size distribution from laboratory experiments based on single-drop fragmentation and comparison with aerial in-situ measurements

Source: [Drop size distribution from laboratory experiments based on single-drop fragmentation and comparison with aerial in-situ measurements](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa49de1e209131ce93a390>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T07:32:37.912Z

Authors: Shubham Chakraborty, Someshwar Sanjay Ade, Lalsingh Devsoth, Lakshmana D. Chandrala, Thara Prabhakaran, Omar K. Matar, Kirti Chandra Sahu

Published: 2025-01-28T03:49:18.000Z

## Abstract

Laboratory experiments and theoretical modelling are conducted to determine the raindrop size distribution (DSD) resulting from distinct fragmentation processes under various upward airstreams. Since weather radar echoes are proportional to the sixth power of the average droplet diameter, understanding the fragmentation mechanisms that lead to different breakup sizes is crucial for accurate rainfall predictions. We utilize a two-parameter gamma distribution for theoretical modelling and estimate the average droplet diameter from the theoretically obtained characteristic sizes, often treated as assumed input parameters for different rain conditions in rainfall modelling. Our experimental and theoretical findings demonstrate a close agreement with the DSD predicted by the Marshall and Palmer relationship for steady rain conditions. Additionally, in situ DSD measurements at different altitudes were obtained through research flights equipped with advanced sensors, further validating our rainfall model. This study underscores the effectiveness of laboratory-scale experiments and the critical importance of accurately characterizing DSD to enhance rainfall predictions.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16686>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.16686.pdf>)
