# Best of Both Worlds: Enforcing Detailed Balance in Machine Learning Models of Transition Rates

Source: [Best of Both Worlds: Enforcing Detailed Balance in Machine Learning Models of Transition Rates](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa47fb1e209131ce92c346>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T06:36:35.629Z

Authors: Anjana Anu Talapatra, Anup Pandey, Matthew S. Wilson, Ying Wai Li, Ghanshyam Pilania, Blas Pedro Uberuaga, Danny Perez

Published: 2024-09-18T19:37:30.000Z

## Abstract

The slow microstructural evolution of materials often plays a key role in determining material properties. When the unit steps of the evolution process are slow, direct simulation approaches such as molecular dynamics become prohibitive and Kinetic Monte-Carlo (kMC) algorithms, where the state-to-state evolution of the system is represented in terms of a continuous-time Markov chain, are instead frequently relied upon to efficiently predict long-time evolution. The accuracy of kMC simulations however relies on the complete and accurate knowledge of reaction pathways and corresponding kinetics. This requirement becomes extremely stringent in complex systems such as concentrated alloys where the astronomical number of local atomic configurations makes the a priori tabulation of all possible transitions impractical. Machine learning models of transition kinetics have been used to mitigate this problem by enabling the efficient on-the-fly prediction of kinetic parameters. In this study, we show how physics-informed ML architectures can exactly enforce the detailed balance condition, by construction. Using the diffusion of a vacancy in a concentrated alloy as an example, we show that such ML architectures also exhibit superior performance in terms of prediction accuracy, demonstrating that the imposition of physical constraints can facilitate the accurate learning of barriers at no increase in computational cost.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12284>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.12284.pdf>)
