# Human-in-the-loop: The future of Machine Learning in Automated Electron Microscopy

Source: [Human-in-the-loop: The future of Machine Learning in Automated Electron Microscopy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa45721e209131ce918ad1>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-27T04:24:10.861Z

Authors: Sergei V. Kalinin, Yongtao Liu, Arpan Biswas, Gerd Duscher, Utkarsh Pratiush, Kevin Roccapriore, Maxim Ziatdinov, Rama Vasudevan

Published: 2023-10-08T05:26:32.000Z

## Abstract

Machine learning methods are progressively gaining acceptance in the electron microscopy community for de-noising, semantic segmentation, and dimensionality reduction of data post-acquisition. The introduction of the APIs by major instrument manufacturers now allows the deployment of ML workflows in microscopes, not only for data analytics but also for real-time decision-making and feedback for microscope operation. However, the number of use cases for real-time ML remains remarkably small. Here, we discuss some considerations in designing ML-based active experiments and pose that the likely strategy for the next several years will be human-in-the-loop automated experiments (hAE). In this paradigm, the ML learning agent directly controls beam position and image and spectroscopy acquisition functions, and human operator monitors experiment progression in real- and feature space of the system and tunes the policies of the ML agent to steer the experiment towards specific objectives.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05018>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.05018.pdf>)
