# Fracture Detection in Wrist X-ray Images Using Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Models

Source: [Fracture Detection in Wrist X-ray Images Using Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Models](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa41031e209131ce8f79bf>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-27T04:13:13.411Z

Authors: F{\\i}rat Hardala\\c{c}, Fatih Uysal, Ozan Peker, Murat \\c{C}i\\c{c}eklida\\u{g}, Tolga Tolunay, Nil Tokg\\"oz, U\\u{g}urhan Kutbay, Boran Demirciler, Fatih Mert

Published: 2021-11-14T14:21:24.000Z

## Abstract

Hospitals, especially their emergency services, receive a high number of wrist fracture cases. For correct diagnosis and proper treatment of these, images obtained from various medical equipment must be viewed by physicians, along with the patients medical records and physical examination. The aim of this study is to perform fracture detection by use of deep learning on wrist Xray images to support physicians in the diagnosis of these fractures, particularly in the emergency services. Using SABL, RegNet, RetinaNet, PAA, Libra R\_CNN, FSAF, Faster R\_CNN, Dynamic R\_CNN and DCN deep learning based object detection models with various backbones, 20 different fracture detection procedures were performed on Gazi University Hospitals dataset of wrist Xray images. To further improve these procedures, five different ensemble models were developed and then used to reform an ensemble model to develop a unique detection model, wrist fracture detection\_combo (WFD\_C). From 26 different models for fracture detection, the highest detection result obtained was 0.8639 average precision (AP50) in the WFD-C model. Huawei Turkey R&D Center supports this study within the scope of the ongoing cooperation project coded 071813 between Gazi University, Huawei and Medskor. Code is available at https://github.com/fatihuysal88/wrist-d

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.07355>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.07355.pdf>)