# Improved crystallographic compatibility and magnetocaloric reversibility in Pt substituted Ni2Mn1.4In0.6 magnetic shape memory Heusler alloy

Source: [Improved crystallographic compatibility and magnetocaloric reversibility in Pt substituted Ni2Mn1.4In0.6 magnetic shape memory Heusler alloy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa3bd01e209131ce8d5a40>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2025-10-25T00:47:49.965Z

Authors: K. K. Dubey, P. Devi, Anupam K. Singh, Sanjay Singh

Published: 2020-04-04T05:10:39.000Z

## Abstract

We present here the improved crystallographic/geometric compatibility and magnetocaloric reversibility by measurement of magnetic entropy change using different protocols in 10% Pt substituted Ni2Mn1.4In0.6 magnetic shape memory alloy. The substitution of Pt reduces the thermal hysteresis about 50% to the Ni2Mn1.4In0.6. The origin of the reduced thermal hysteresis is investigated by the crystallographic compatibility of the austenite and martensite phases. The calculated middle eigenvalue of the transformation matrix turned out to be 0.9982, which is very close to 1 (deviation is only 0.18%) suggests for the crystallographic compatibility between the austenite and martensite phases in Ni1.9Pt0.1Mn1.4In0.6. A very small thermal hysteresis and crystallographic compatibility between two phases in this alloy system indicate a stress-free transition layer (i.e. perfect habit plane) between the austenite and martensite phase, which is expected to give reversible martensite phase transition and therefore reversible magnetocaloric effect (MCE) as well. The calculated value of the isothermal entropy change ({\\Delta}Siso) using the magnetization curve under three different measurement protocols (i.e. isothermal, loop, and isofield measurement protocol) is found to be nearly same indicating a reversible MCE in the present alloy system. Our work provides a path to design new magnetic shape memory Heusler alloys for magnetic refrigeration and also suggest that any of the above measurement protocol can be used for the calculation of {\\Delta}Siso for materials satisfying geometrical compatibility condition.

## Recorded benchmark results

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

## Original sources and implementation

[Original paper](<https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.01854>)

[PDF](<https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.01854.pdf>)